Notes from Megameeting 28th April 2008

Attendees:

BruceAmbacher UM
CandidaFenton HATII, Univ Glasgow
JohnGarrett GSFC
KatiaThomaz INPE, Brazil
MarieWaltz Center for Research Libraries
MarkConrad NARA
RobertDowns Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), U Columbia
SimonLambert STFC

The discussion was a combination of audio and typed chat. For this reason the chat transcript (given below) gives an incomplete representation and may be hard to follow.

Progress made: Very good progress was made through the working document. Sections B2.3 to B2.9 were all completed, with amendments agreed and made on the wiki. The only exception was the last comment in B2.4 from JohnGarrett, which was deferred and will taken into account for a possible additional requirement.

SimonLambert reported on behalf of DavidGiaretta that there is good progress to Working Group status. David will send an email soon on the subject. Everyone involved should check their declared commitment of effort - this is a requirement of CCSDS.

Actions:

  • All to make comments on the remaining sections of B2 and onwards to B3.
  • SimonLambert to update the availability matrix for future weeks.
  • All to check their declared effort commitment on declared commitment of effort.

KatiaThomaz >> (All): we should update the availability matrix, don´t we?
KatiaThomaz >> (All): last week i couldn´t participate...
BruceAmbacher >> (All): Katia.  What a good idea - to be able to know who might be on the call
KatiaThomaz >> (All): b2.3, ok?
BruceAmbacher >> (All): Agreed, B2.4 covers John's comment
Mark Conrad >> (All): Candida, can you hear the audio?
Mark Conrad >> (All): Good morning Marie
Marie Waltz >> (All): Good morning everyone
KatiaThomaz >> (All): hi marie
RobertDowns >> (All): Hi Marie
candida fenton >> (All): Hi marie
Marie Waltz >> (All): I don' think my mike is working, but I can hear
Mark Conrad >> (All): Marie, If you said something, I cannot hear it.
RobertDowns >> (All): I could not hear Marie, either.
KatiaThomaz >> (All): me too
Marie Waltz >> (All): Yeah,  well I can hear and type so don't let all of this hold us up. :)
Marie Waltz >> (All): no objection
Marie Waltz >> (All): no objection
BruceAmbacher >> (All): With two divergent views on what John means should we table this until he is on the chat?
Marie Waltz >> (All): Yes, I think if John isn't here, we can't be sure what he meant.
BruceAmbacher >> (All): Are you referring to data or to Representation Information?
KatiaThomaz >> (All): sorry. i lost the line...
Mark Conrad >> (All):  Welcome back, Katia.
Marie Waltz >> (All): I agree
BruceAmbacher >> (All): Yes, first part is in B2.4 Requirement statement.
BruceAmbacher >> (All): yes
Marie Waltz >> (All): yes
KatiaThomaz >> (All): yes
candida fenton >> (All): yes
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I accept Mark's first suggestion/addition.
Simon Lambert >> (All): Hi everyone - sorry I am late (again)
RobertDowns >> (All): Hi Simon
Marie Waltz >> (All): Hi Simon
Mark Conrad >> (All): Hello Simon! Welcome!
Marie Waltz >> (All): great
candida fenton >> (All): Good news
KatiaThomaz >> (All): hi simon
RobertDowns >> (All): Yes, great news!
Simon Lambert >> (All): Thanks Marks
KatiaThomaz >> (All): no objection
Marie Waltz >> (All): no
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I accept the two changes
RobertDowns >> (All): agree to accept both changes
KatiaThomaz >> (All): there must be traceability
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I accept the proposed movement into Supporting Text
KatiaThomaz >> (All): i agree
KatiaThomaz >> (All): hi john
RobertDowns >> (All): I also accept the movement of the two sentences to Supporting Text.
Marie Waltz >> (All): no objection
candida fenton >> (All): I agree
KatiaThomaz >> (All): no objection
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I accept 
Marie Waltz >> (All): Yes  please move it
RobertDowns >> (All): I agree
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I see a close link between the two paragraphs above Mark's comment.
Marie Waltz >> (All): NO ojection
Marie Waltz >> (All): objection
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I agree
JohnGarrett >> (All): No objection
KatiaThomaz >> (All): no objection
RobertDowns >> (All): No objection
candida fenton >> (All): No objection
KatiaThomaz >> (All): we can move this to the discussion
BruceAmbacher >> (All): John, there has been a lot of work on persistent identifiers since OAIS
Marie Waltz >> (All): yes
candida fenton >> (All): no
RobertDowns >> (All): I agree to move that sentence to the discussion session
BruceAmbacher >> (All): agreed
KatiaThomaz >> (All): agree too
Marie Waltz >> (All): Yes move it
RobertDowns >> (All): Agreed
BruceAmbacher >> (All): agreed
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I had no concerns with the added text just wanted clarification and open discussion if necessary
Marie Waltz >> (All): No objection
KatiaThomaz >> (All): ok
candida fenton >> (All): ok
BruceAmbacher >> (All): Insert at end of first sentence
KatiaThomaz >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): No objection
RobertDowns >> (All): ok
JohnGarrett >> (All): Sometimes there is both general representation information (e.g. format information) and also specific representation information (e.g., meanings of individual fields within a dataset).  Often the general information will be available in an external repository, but the local repository may need to maintain the instance specific information.
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I can accept this addition.
Mark Conrad >> (All): me too
KatiaThomaz >> (All): me too
Marie Waltz >> (All): Fine with me
RobertDowns >> (All): agreed
candida fenton >> (All): me too
RobertDowns >> (All): at the end is good with me
BruceAmbacher >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): I think for the flow it should be the second paragraph
Mark Conrad >> (All): I agree with Marie.
JohnGarrett >> (All): OK with me
KatiaThomaz >> (All): no
BruceAmbacher >> (All): no
KatiaThomaz >> (All): b2.9
Marie Waltz >> (All): onward
BruceAmbacher >> (All): What if the example is cut to: Proposed Revision: Viewable documentation on how the repository acquires and manages Preservation Description Information (PDI)
RobertDowns >> (All): The repository must maintain viewable documentation on how the repository acquires and manages Preservation Description Information (PDI) and context information.
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I propose this replaces the first sentence in Supporting Text
Marie Waltz >> (All): no objection
BruceAmbacher >> (All): I like the suggestion
RobertDowns >> (All): Sounds good
KatiaThomaz >> (All): sounds good
KatiaThomaz >> (All): Robert, why content information as it makes part of PDI?
KatiaThomaz >> (All): context
KatiaThomaz >> (All): the repository demonstrate it acquires and manages PDI
BruceAmbacher >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): ok
KatiaThomaz >> (All): ok
candida fenton >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): yes
JohnGarrett >> (All): Yes those updates are OK with me
KatiaThomaz >> (All): agree with Bruce
RobertDowns >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): Yes
BruceAmbacher >> (All): ok
Marie Waltz >> (All): ok
RobertDowns >> (All): ok

-- SimonLambert - 29 Apr 2008

Topic revision: r1 - 2008-04-29 - SimonLambert
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2018 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback